The escalating conflict in the Middle East represents more than a regional security crisis. It has become a significant geopolitical test for BRICS, expanding beyond its original five members to include key Middle Eastern powers such as Iran, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The conflict is forcing the grouping to navigate increasingly complex political realities while attempting to preserve its vision of greater multipolar cooperation.
China’s Strategic Diplomacy
One of the most significant questions is China’s role. Despite its close strategic partnership with Iran, Beijing is unlikely to become directly involved militarily. China’s primary strategic priorities remain Taiwan and the South China Sea, where it continues to concentrate its military and diplomatic resources. A major military commitment in the Middle East would divert attention and resources from these core national interests.
Equally important, China has cultivated strong economic and diplomatic relationships not only with Iran, but also with Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other Gulf states. Preserving those relationships is likely to remain a higher priority than becoming directly involved in the conflict.
This balancing act reflects one of BRICS’ greatest strengths, but also one of its greatest vulnerabilities. The expanded grouping now includes countries with diverse interests, alliances and security concerns. While BRICS has positioned itself as a platform for cooperation among emerging economies, conflicts involving member states or close regional partners inevitably place pressure on the bloc’s internal cohesion.
Regional Fragmentation and Economic Consequences
Some geopolitical analysts argue that the current conflict risks fragmenting relationships across the Middle East. They contend that Iranian retaliation against Israel, together with attacks affecting neighbouring states including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Bahrain and Kuwait, has exposed political divisions within the region. According to this view, prolonged instability could weaken broader regional cooperation and, by extension, complicate collaboration within an expanded BRICS framework.
The conflict also carries significant economic implications. BRICS today includes some of the world’s largest economies, including China, India and Russia, together with several of the world’s leading energy producers such as Saudi Arabia, Iran and the United Arab Emirates. Any prolonged instability affecting energy production, shipping routes or investment confidence has the potential to influence not only regional economies but also the wider BRICS economic agenda.
This comes at a time when BRICS continues to grow in global influence. The bloc represents a substantial share of the world’s population, economic output and natural resources, and has increasingly positioned itself as an advocate for a more balanced international order. The expansion of BRICS into the Middle East has further strengthened its strategic importance by bringing together major energy exporters alongside some of the world’s fastest-growing emerging markets.
Lessons from History and the Road Ahead
The geopolitical importance of BRICS has not gone unnoticed. In recent years, Western policymakers have expressed growing concern about the bloc’s expanding economic influence and its efforts to strengthen cooperation in trade, finance and development. The growing prominence of BRICS has placed the organisation at the centre of discussions about the future of global governance and the evolution of a more multipolar international system.
History provides important lessons. During the Iran-Iraq War of the 1980s, the United States provided significant support to Saddam Hussein’s Iraq as a counterweight to revolutionary Iran. Years later, the US-led invasion of Iraq fundamentally altered the regional balance of power, while the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan contributed to prolonged instability that enabled extremist organisations to flourish. These experiences continue to shape regional perceptions of external military intervention and inform contemporary debates over the potential consequences of any wider conflict involving Iran.
Ultimately, the greatest challenge for BRICS is not simply managing the immediate crisis but demonstrating that a diverse coalition of major emerging powers can remain united despite differing national interests. If the bloc can continue promoting dialogue, economic cooperation and diplomatic engagement while avoiding internal fragmentation, it will reinforce its credibility as an influential force in shaping the future international order.
The Middle East conflict therefore represents more than another regional confrontation. It is a defining test of whether BRICS can transform its growing economic weight into meaningful geopolitical cohesion. The decisions made by its members in the months ahead may shape not only the future of the organisation, but also the balance of power within an increasingly multipolar world.
Written by:
*Cole Jackson
*Director of International Relations
Sekunjalo Group Africa Holdings
**The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL.
** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE https://bricscg.com/
** Follow @ (https://x.com/brics_daily)brics_daily (https://x.com/brics_daily)on Twitter for daily BRICS+ updates and instagram @brics_daily (https://www.instagram.com/brics_daily?igsh=bmhvbTd0YzA4a2wx)
